Compiler
Assembles the panel’s voices into the single answer that reaches the clarity check.
23 personalities · 2 meta-personalities
The cognitive council, mapped to the human brain.
Algorithms route the question. Distinct human modes of judgement contest the answer. Select any personality to trace its public cognitive mapping and role in the council.
23Cognitive personalities
5Fixed panel slots
2Meta-personalities
Best-fit neuroanatomical approximation · not clinical localisation
The human responseto algorithmic efficiency
Representative 3D mesh brain · multi-region interaction
01 · Premise
A single voice cannot pressure-test itself.
Retrieval can tolerate one register. Decisions that compound need competing disciplines: practical, strategic, ethical, sceptical and human.
Efficiency produces an answer. Judgement tests whether it should survive.
Each personality is a constrained reasoning role. The purpose is not theatrical disagreement. It is to make different forms of scrutiny visible before an answer reaches the user.
01Challenger
Asks what could break the proposed answer.
02Pragmatist
Asks what can actually be done under real constraints.
03Ethicist
Asks who pays the price — reviewing only the question through a moral lens, never the panel's answer.
04Compiler
Assembles the panel’s voices into a single answer.
05Outsider
Reads the final answer cold and sends it back when it is not clear.
02 · Sequence
Five slots hold the shape of every panel.
The personalities vary by question category. The sequence does not: Lead, Depth, Test, Ground and Human.
INPUTYour question
Classified before the panel is locked.
Level 1Lead
Clarifies what is actually being decided.
Level 2Depth
Judges context and hidden assumptions.
Level 3Test
Challenges and stress-tests the answer.
Level 4Ground
Checks practical conditions and feasibility.
Level 5Human
Checks impact, meaning and who is affected.
SURFACEOne answer
Compiled, audited and checked for clarity.
Ethicist
Reviews only the question in parallel, never the panel's answer, and may also take a panel seat when ethics is central.
Outsider
Sees only the final answer. If it is confusing, the panel must present its findings again.